Sunday, 20 October 2013
Beer Advertisements: Is the glass half full for everyone?
Beer advertisements are one
of the main offenders when it comes to using sexist stereotypes. Women are
constantly portrayed as either sexual objects or nagging housewives in an
attempt to attract the male audience. The phrase “sex sells” comes into play
here. Women are regularly sexualised to entice male customers into buying a
specific brand of beer. They will most often have high amounts of skin showing
in places such as the breasts, buttocks, arms and legs. If that does not work
advertisers then try to entice husbands or boyfriends by playing on the
irritating wife or girlfriend stereotype. It is often repeat offenders when it
comes to this type of advertising. Brands such as Skol, Heineken and Budweiser
are the main beer producers that have consistently sexist advertisements. This
type of advertisement appeals to the target audience by degrading women with cliché
stereotypes. Most of the beer advertisements today have very little to do with
the product that is being advertised because they very heavily feature
half-naked women. In an article on everydayfeminism.com an article about
advertising affecting rape culture it is stated that “The sexualisation of
women sends a clear message – it is a man’s role to gaze at women and it is a
woman’s role to be a sexual object.”
Example 1
The first example of the degrading of women in beer advertisements is shown in these two Budweiser posters. In both examples, the women are shown to be a part of the beer bottle therefore objectifying them in a distasteful way. The reason that advertisers choose to portray women as objects is because they have sex appeal which makes the product look more desirable. Many other beer companies such as Heineken, Michelob and Beers of Mozambique have used this advertising technique in their commercials as well. These types of advertisements allow men to believe that buying beer will make them appealing to women such as the ones in the commercials which is, of course, not the case.
Example 2
Translations:
Fountain- If
the guy who invented the drinking fountain drank Skol; it would not be like
this but like this. Everything’s round with Skol.
Breasts- If the guy who invented the censor strip drank Skol; it would not be like this but like this. Everything’s round with Skol.
Bra- If the guy who invented
the bra drank Skol; it would not be like this but like this. Everything’s round
with Skol.Shower Curtain- If the guy who invented the shower curtain drank Skol; it would not be like this but like this. Everything’s round with Skol.
Example 3
In these advertisements by Guinness and Schneider the product is shaped to resemble parts of a woman’s body. This is a similar advertising technique as the first example where woman were dressed as the beer. These images attract the audience’s eyes by causing the beer to bear a resemblance to taboo body parts in Western culture. If there was actually a naked women on either of these posters they would be banned from the public’s viewing, however because of their somewhat clever disguise the posters are viable. The man grabbing for the “breast” in the first Schneider poster is a crude example of how women are objects for the satisfaction of men. The encouragement of such vulgar behaviour can have an impression on the rape culture of society. Images such as the examples on this blog can make it seem okay for a man to grab a woman like this without her consent. Especially as in these advertisements the women are dehumanised by only showing parts of their bodies, reinforcing the idea that they do not have feelings and men can take advantage of that for their own pleasure.
Example 4
In this commercial
for Bavaria Brasil beer one of the two men sitting on the beach picks up a beer
bottle out of the chilly bin. As he does this a typically beautiful Brazilian
women in a bikini rises up out the water. It does not take the man long to
figure out that the beer bottle controls what the women does. He begins to take
advantage of the women by causing her to make movements such as spin and lie
down in the sand. His friend soon realises what is going on and attempts to
snatch the bottle from his friend so as to have control over the mysterious
women. They then begin to unpeel the label off of the bottle and the woman
begins to undo her bikini bottoms. This commercial is not only encouraging men
to objectify women and control them but for women to allow themselves to be
objectified and controlled. The woman in this advertisement does not look at
all unimpressed that these men are forcing her to do what they want her to, in
fact she smiles for the entire time. A common recurrence throughout these advertisements
is the difference in beauty between the genders. Much like in this commercial,
the women are always very beautiful and the men are generally quite ordinary
looking in comparison. This is most likely because the key demographic for beer
sales is heterosexual men. The companies want their consumers to believe that
if they drink their brand of beer then they can get beautiful women such as the
ones featured in the ads no matter what they look like. Although most men would
be smart enough to see through this over-exaggeration seeing this can still
trigger a subconscious thought process within them. They will not believe that
this will actually be true but they will remember the commercial because of the
attraction to the female actresses or models. The female in beer advertisements
is used to fulfil the male fantasy by overly sexualising everything that she
does and being exposed much more than any woman in reality would.
Example 5
In this commercial
for Tui beer three men are attempting to break into the Tui beer factory which
is entirely run by females. Of course being a beer ad targeted at men these
females must be dressed in less clothing than would be suitable for work in
real life. For example, a security guard would normally wear long pants and a
button-up t-shirt; however in this advertisement the security guards are
wearing short skirts and tops that expose a great deal of cleavage and midriff.
The women in this commercial are portrayed as rather naïve and stupid as the
men easily sneak past them with ease by distracting the security guards with
high heels and obvious camouflage against a brick wall. The males are fully
clothed in this commercial and the women are skimpily dressed which is another
recurring similarity with beer advertisements. This is another ploy used by
companies to entice male consumers into buying their products. The demographic
for beer advertisements is white, heterosexual males. Since the demographic is
heterosexual males they would be more attracted to half-naked women rather than
half-naked men. This is why the men in beer advertisements are almost always
fully-clothed. The females in this Tui commercial are also portrayed as being
spoilsports. They are the reason that the men have to sneak into the factory
and are the antagonists of the advertisement. This is a common stereotype used
in commercials though women who are portrayed like this are usually not
good-looking or are the partner of the male. In this advertisement the
spoilsports are also good-looking making them a combination of the two
stereotypes.
Example 6
In these advertisements for Cooper’s 2.9%
alcohol beer the concept of “beer goggles” is played on by showing women
“realistically.” The scenario behind these ads is most likely that the man is
hoping to have sexual relations with the woman in each advertisement, however
because he is not as intoxicated he can still see how she really looks. It shows
the parts of the women that are disguised by the beer and would make a man
attracted to her such as larges breasts, long legs and a pretty face. The
selling point is that because there is less alcohol, the “bad” aspects such as
old age, extra weight and general look of the women will still be visible. This
potentially saves the man from having sexual relations with her and regretting
it later. This gives the idea that a woman can be judged by her looks, not her
personality. It also implies that a woman is not worth pursuing because she is
deemed “ugly” by the creators of this advertisement. The message that women
would receive from these advertisements is that you should not look like any of
these women if they ever want to find a husband. Of course this is not the case
but with advertisers constantly reinforcing this, the self-esteem of women
would decrease greatly.
Relevant Source 1
This article written by Sarah
Ogden explains how the media in society today plays a large part in the
encouragement of rape culture. Rape culture is an environment where sexual
violence and acts towards women are considered normal. The article talks about
how the exposure of women in advertisements in order to entice male customers
can cause the objectification of women in real life. The women’s consent for
becoming a sexual object becomes insignificant because in the advertisements
she never consents to being leered at or controlled by the men. It also
explains how the objectification of women can make men believe that women are
theirs to be had and controlled. This further encourages the idea that a
women’s consent is not needed and men are able to sexually objectify women at
their will. Sarah Ogden writes, “It’s easy to see why so many people objectify
women’s bodies when it’s so normalised in our media.” In an article on
link.springer.com called ‘Women and ‘Body-isms’ in Television Beer Commercials”
the author discusses the impacts of these beer commercials and mentions the
sexual harassment allegations made by female workers at Stroh Brewery. After
further research an article on the Chicago Tribune website gave more detail.
Four women, who were all workers at the Brewery, filed a lawsuit against Stroh
Brewery on the grounds of sexual harassment in the workplace. The women believe
that the cause of the harassment from male workers was a series of Old Milwaukee
advertisements featuring the Swedish Bikini Team. The Stroh Company said that there
was no connection between the advertisements and the alleged harassment and
that they have a very strong policy against sexual harassment. However, Lori
Peterson, the attorney of the four women believes that the Stroh Company cannot
really care about ending sexism when they use it in all of their commercials.
She says “You can’t tell me a company is interested in ending sexism in its
plants when it spends millions of dollars a year promoting it.” Although her
opinion could be obscured by her involvement with the case, Lori Peterson still
has valid reasoning. These beer advertisements are obviously having an effect,
not just on women in society but also on the workers who are making and
bottling it.
Relevant Source 2
This article written by J.
Kevin Thompson and Leslie J. Heinberg discusses the influence of advertising on
eating disorders. In a study, performed by the two professors, a 10 minute
video of commercials, such as women in bikinis selling beer, were shown to a group
of college women. All of the commercials presented featured women displaying
and highlighting society’s idea of beauty, such as a thin figure or overall
attractiveness. After the viewing the women had higher levels of depression,
anger and weight and appearance discontentment than the group of women who
viewed neutral commercials. This shows that beer advertising is having a
negative impact on the women of society. According the Eating Disorder
Association of New Zealand website approximately 68,000 New Zealanders will
develop an eating disorder. The website also states that the portrayal of women
in advertising as young, thin and vulnerable explains why 90% of people who
suffer from eating disorders are female.
Relevant Source 3
Relevant Source 4
This article from the NZ Herald website discusses
the issues surrounding a Tui advertisement similar to the one mentioned in
example 5. DB Breweries who released the commercial had to defend themselves against
an Auckland Feminist Group. The group wanted the company to retract the advertisement
because they believed it was degrading to women, to which the company refused.
Spokeswoman for the Auckland Feminist Group believes that the advertisement allows
society to discriminate against one another. She says, “The other problem with
this ad is it is saying sexism is OK as long as it is funny. We’re saying
sexist humour, racist humour, homophobic humour – none of it is OK and all of
it is harmful.” These sorts of advertisements are having an effect on society
by saying that degrading women is fine as long as it is in jest. They put men
in a higher position when compared with women and give them more authority and
rights.
Task C
The objectification of women in beer advertisements
exists because beer companies are trying to sell to a specific demographic.
This demographic is heterosexual, mainly white males so to sell to this group
companies have discovered that exposed women work. Heterosexual men are
obviously more attracted to a half-naked, good-looking woman than a covered up,
average-looking woman; it’s human nature. However, the Advertising Code for New
Zealand shows that many beer advertisements are breaking this code. Number 5
under the ‘Basic Principles’ title states “Advertisements should not employ
sexual appeal in a manner which is exploitative and degrading of any individual
or group of people in society to promote the sale of products or services. In
particular people should not be portrayed in a manner which uses sexual appeal
simply to draw attention to an unrelated product.” Number 2 on the same list
states “Advertisements should not portray people in a manner which is
reasonably likely to cause serious or widespread hostility, contempt, abuse or ridicule.”
Although the other advertisements used for examples are from other countries,
the Tui commercials are from New Zealand and certainly do not comply with this
code. The only reason that beer companies use this technique for advertising is
because it makes their product look desirable to their key demographic which
earns them more money from sales. If they did not use this technique for their
commercials they would not make nearly as much money as they do now.
Task D
There are always positive and negative views
surrounding a topic such as the objectification of women; some are very
strongly against it, some very strongly for it and some who are in the middle.
One person who disapproves of the objectification of women is opinions
columnist Joanna Rothenberg. She believes that women are objectified in
advertisements every day. She says, “We see women being objectified daily…Women
blending in an advertisement as the beer bottle. Not drinking one like “a man”
but portrayed as the actual beer bottle – something that can be taken a hold
of, taken advantage of.” Joanna Rothenberg could have this view because she is
a woman so her views are biased by her gender. Another person who thinks like
Joanna is Sarah Martin McConnell who is a columnist for the Tennessean newspaper.
She believes that women are being portrayed in the media as inadequate when
compared with men. Like Joanna her views can be influenced by her gender as
they are the ones being discriminated against. She says, “Media’s ubiquitous
objectification and degradation of girls and women delivers a clear and
sinister message: that we are second-rate citizens who should look sexy, earn
less and be subordinate to the men in charge.” On the other side of the
argument is actress Cameron Diaz. She believes that women want to be
objectified and it’s empowering. She says, “I think every woman does want to be
objectified. There’s a little part of you at all times that hopes to be somewhat
objectified, and I think it’s healthy.” Under the article user ameliaray said, “Oh,
and who amongst you [other commenters] don’t enjoy the occasional Calvin Klein
men’s underwear ad? Or is it only bad when it’s objectifying women?” A user who
commented on a blog post called “What is ‘objectification’ and what’s wrong
with it?” expressed their opinion about objectification in general. They believe
that fighting objectification shows a deeper underlying problem. They say, “Is
fighting against objectification a moral stance? No. It’s an expression of
insecurity and is related to sexual jealousy, not a concern about right and
wrong.”
Task E
One conclusion that can be drawn from the issue is
that society as a whole is becoming more used to seeing exposed women in
advertisements. According to a study performed by Amanda Zimmerman and John
Dahlberg “young women today are more forgiving of companies that portray
females offensively in their advertisements than young women were a decade ago.”
The participants also agreed that although the advertisements were sexualised,
they were not offensive or unethical. This shows that the constant exposure to
objectified women in beer advertisements and the like is normalising sexist
images. As mentioned in task c, the Advertising Code for New Zealand
specifically states that sexual or discriminating images may not be used in
adverts. This breach of regulation can cause an increase in other media forms
adopted the same practices, which is another conclusion that can be drawn. It
was in 1949 that woman first started being used for the sale of beer through
the invention of Mabel, the blonde bartender. This has, in turn, influenced
other types of media such as music videos, television shows and movies. The
increase in sexual images being received by the public has continued to influence
the increase of objectification and sexuality in the media. Sexualisation and
objectification of women needs to stop being an expected feature of
advertising, particularly beer advertising. This issue is teaching people that discrimination
is alright and how to do it effectively.
References
Background image of blog
retrieved from http://snowbrains.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/dc6a6677-0ea6-4b1f-976b-702c7a3e7a89.jpeg
Inventor of the bra information retrieved from http://inventors.about.com/od/bstartinventions/a/brassiere.htm
Rape culture information retrieved from http://everydayfeminism.com/2013/01/five-ways-rape-culture-exists-unnoticed/
Definition of rape culture
retrieved from http://www.marshall.edu/wcenter/sexual-assault/rape-culture/
Eating disorder statistics
retrieved from http://www.ed.org.nz/index.asp?pageID=2145862939
Eating disorder information
retrieved from http://www.ed.org.nz/index.asp?pageID=2145862940
Article about Women and “Body-isms”
in Television Beer Commercials retrieved from http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF01544592#page-1
Follow-up article about the
Stroh lawsuit retrieved from http://articles.chicagotribune.com/1992-03-09/business/9201220508_1_sexual-harassment-stroh-cos-allegations
Opinions from Auckland
Feminist Group retrieved from http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10787021
Opinion from Joanna
Rothenberg retrieved from http://www.dailyillini.com/opinion/columns/article_ca4bd7b6-ad56-11e2-a9c4-001a4bcf6878.html#user-comment-area
Opinion from Sarah Martin
McConnell retrieved from http://www.tennessean.com/article/20130924/OPINION02/309240006?nclick_check=1
Opinions from Cameron Diaz
and site user retrieved from http://au.eonline.com/news/364751/cameron-diaz-says-women-want-to-be-objectified
Opinion of objectification
retrieved from http://measureofdoubt.com/2011/10/20/what-is-objectification-and-whats-wrong-with-it/
Study by Amanda Zimmerman and
John Dahlberg retrieved from http://pure.au.dk/portal/files/10594/8_-_sexual_objectification_of_women.pdf
Information about Mabel
retrieved from http://heymabelblacklabel.com/id39.htm
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)